von Marc Stauch

  • Bücher

    Stauch, M., & Wheat, K. (2019). Text, Cases and Materials on Medical Law and Ethics (6. Auflage)

    Stauch, M. (2008): The Law of Medical Negligence in England and Germany – a Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Hart Publishing (ISBN 978-1-84113-646-2) (Informationen zum Buch: hier). (Übersetzt ins Chinesische 2012: Law Press, Beijing, ISBN 978 7511 83067 8.)

  • Aufsätze und Kommentare

    (2023) “Augmenting the Green Deal - The Case for Introducing Personal Carbon Trading in the EU”, in The European Green Deal and its Implementation, C. Trüe und L. Scholz (eds), Nomos Verlag, 61-77. 

    (2023) “The ‘patient-friendly’ medical injury liability rules in Germany: implications for patient safety?”, in Research Handbook: Patient Safety and the Law, J. Tingle et al (eds), Elgar, 165-176.

    (2023) Buch Rezension: The Development of Medical Liability in Germany, 1800–1945, by C.P. McGrath, in 139 Law Quarterly Review 171-74.

    (2022) “Regulating the Benefits of eHealth – information disclosure duties in the age of AI”, in AI in eHealth: Human Autonomy, Data Governance and Privacy in Healthcare, M. Corrales Compagnucci et al (eds), Cambridge University Press, 378-400.

    (2022) “Data Protection and Cybersecurity Certification Activities and Schemes in the Energy Sector”, in Electronics 11(6), 965. Zusammen mit I. Nwankwo et al.

    (2021) “Towards a Digital Ecosystem of Trust: Ethical, Legal and Societal Implications” in Opinio Juris In Comparatione, 1/2021, 131-156. Zusammen mit J. de Hoven et al.

    (2020) “’Cover this data that I cannot see’: Privacy by Design in Machine Translation”, in Maschinelle Übersetzung für Übersetzungsprofis, J. Porsiel (ed), BDÜ Fachverlag, 42-57. Zusammen mit P. Kamocki.

    (2019) Landesbericht: Großbritannien”, in Betrieblicher Datenschutz, N. Forgó et al (eds), Beck, 1521-1524.

    (2018) “Health data use for medical research and the impact of the new General Data Protection Regulation”, in Medicine, Law and the Internet, E. Symeonidou-Kastanidou et al (eds), Nomiki Bibliothiki SA, 202-206.

    (2017) "Data protection law", in P. Giliker (ed), Research Handbook on EU Tort Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.

    (2017) “Data Protection in Machine Translation under the GDPR”, in J. Porsiel (ed) Machinelle Übersetzung,BDÜ Fachverlag, Berlin. Zusammen mit P. Kamocki.

    (2016) Using Patient Avatars to Promote Health Data Sharing Applications: Perspectives and Regulatory Challenges.
    European Journal of Health Law 23(2):175. Zusammen mit A. Dahi, N. Forgó, und S. Jensen.

    (2015) 'The 2013 German Patient Rights Act - Codifying Medical Malpractice Compensation', Journal of European Tort Law 6: 85.

    (2013) 'The Draft Data ProtectionRegulation and the Secondary Use of Patient Data for Research: Projects amd Concerns' in Journal of professional Negligence 29: 72.

    (2013) 'Using EHRS to design drug repostioning trails: a deolved approch to data protection' in International Review of Law, Computers and Technology 27. Zusammen mit N. Forgó und T. Krügel.

    (2011) 'Medical Malpractice and Compensation in Germany', in Chicago-Kent Law Review (2011) 86: 1139.

    (2011) "Patient Safety and Clinical Risk Management in Germany", in Tingle, J. and Bark, P. (eds) Patient Safety, Law Policy and Practice, Abingdon: Routledge.

    (2010): "Die Pflichten eines Krankenhauses nach Art. 2 der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention, den Suizid eines Patienten zu verhindern (Entscheidung des englischen House of Lords vom 10. Dezember 2008)" Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht 18: 680.

    (2009): “’Material Contribution’ as a Response to Causal Uncertainty: Time for a Rethink”, Cambridge Law Journal 68: 27.

    (2005): “Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in German Law”, Contemporary Issues in Law 7: 301.

    (2005): “Causation and Confusion with regard to Non-Disclosure of Medical Risks: Chester v Afshar”, Nottingham Law Journal 14: 66.

    (2005): “Approaches to Fault in German Tort Law”, Torts Law Journal 13: 242.

    (2002) "The Legal Issues Arising from Re B (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment)", Journal of Medical Ethics 28: 232.

    (2001): "Risk and Remoteness of Damage in Negligence", Modern Law Review 64: 191.

    (2001): "Pregnancy and the Human Rights Act 1998" in Garwood-Gowers, A. & Tingle, J. (eds) Healthcare law: the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998, London: Cavendish Publishing.

    (2000): “Causal Authorship and the Equality Principle: a Defence of the Acts/Omissions Distinction in Euthanasia" Journal of Medical Ethics 26: 237.

    (2000) " Taking the Consequences for Failure to Warn of Medical Risks: Chappel v Hart", Modern Law Review 63: 261.

    (1999): "Is there a Common Law Duty to Disclose Genetic Information?", Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 7: 209, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    (1997): "Causation, Risk and Loss of Chance in Medical Negligence", Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 17: 205.

    (1997): "Court-Authorised Caesarian Sections and the Principle of Patient Autonomy: Re MB (an Adult: Medical Treatment)", Nottingham Law Journal 6: 74.

    (1995): "Rationality and the Refusal of Medical Treatment: a Critique of the Recent Approach of the English Courts", Journal of Medical Ethics 21: 162.

  • Newsmeldungen (ZD-Aktuell)

    UK: High Court Invokes ‘Novus Actus Interveniens’ Principle to Limit Damages for Data Protection Breach, ZD-Aktuell 2023, 01285

    UK: Cabinet Office Benefits from new ICO Approach to Penalising Public Sector Data Breaches, ZD-Aktuell 2023, 01077

    UK: Ongoing Public Consultation by Information Commissioners Office on Anonymisation, Pseudonymisation and Privacy Enhancing Technologies, ZD-Aktuell 2022, 01142

    UK: High Court Clarifies Compensation Principles for ‘Lowest-End’ Data Protection Breaches, ZD-Aktuell 2022, 01452

    UK: ICO Fines Clearview AI Facial Recognition Company for Breaches of Data Protection Law, ZD-Aktuell 2022, 01299

    UK: High Court Dismisses Claim against Hospital for Alleged Failure properly to Protect Patient Data from Access by Third Party, ZD-Aktuell 2022, 01252

    UK: Supreme Court Holds (overturning Court of Appeal) that Compensation under Data Protection Law Requires Proof of Damage, ZD-Aktuell 2022, 00018

    UK: Government Publishes Proposals for Reforming UK Data Protection Law, ZD-Aktuell 2021, 05532

    UK: Information Tribunal Decision on Statistical Data as Personal Data, ZD-Aktuell 2021, 05151 

    UK: EC Draft Adequacy Decision Opens Way for Continuing Data Transfers Between EU and UK-Based Controllers and Processors, ZD-Aktuell 2021, 05103

    UK: Some Clues to the Shape of UK Data Protection after the Brexit Transition Phase, ZD-Aktuell 2020, 07092

    UK: Supreme Court Decision Reversing Imposition of Vicarious Liability on Company for Deliberate Data Breach by Employee, ZD-Aktuell 2020, 07200

    UK: High Court Finds Breach of Data Protection in School Letter about Disabled Pupil, ZD-Aktuell 2020, 07252

    UK: Court of Appeal Finds Police Force’s Pilot-Testing of Automated Facial Recognition Technology Unlawful, ZD-Aktuell 2020, 07307

    UK: High Court Affirms Need for a Claimant to Show Damage in Order to Receive Compensation for Unlawful Data Processing, ZD-Aktuell 2019, 06417

    UK: Court of Appeal Allows Action to Proceed for Data Misuse without Claimants having to Show Damage, ZD-Aktuell 2019, 06898

    UK: United Kingdom ICO Publishes Report on the First Year of the GDPR’s Operation, ZD-Aktuell 2019, 06721

    UK: The ‘Right to be Forgotten’ in Relation to Internet Searches that Reveal Past Criminal Offences, ZD-Aktuell 2018, 06177

    UK: ICO Issues Draft Guidance on Data Protection Impact Assessments, ZD-Aktuell 2018, 06074

    UK: Vicarious Liability on Company for Deliberate Data Breach by Employee, ZD-Aktuell 2018, 05979

    UK: Court of Appeal Reverses High Court Decision on Subject Access Requests in ‘Mixed Data’ Cases, ZD-Aktuell 2018, 06316

    UK: Two New Court of Appeal Rulings on Subject Access Requests”
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2017, 05682

    UK: ICO Issues Guidance to Organisations on What to Expect and When in Relation to GDPR Implementation
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2017, 05507

    UK: Government Publishes Plans on Shape of UK Data Protection After Brexit
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2017, 05781

    UK: English Court of Appeal Rules on Legal Conditions for Sharing Private Health Information
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2016, 05101

    UK: Court decision quantifying damages for police misuse of passenger air travel data
    Beck Online, ZD Aktuell 2016, 05389

    UK: Vidal-Hall and Others v. Google Inc (zusammen mit M. Goralczyk)
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2015, 04652

    Max Mosley v Google Inc
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2015, 04570

    UK: Information Commissioner Issues Updated Guidance on Use of CCTV Cameras
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2015, 04508

    UK: AB v Ministry of Justice
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2014, 04456

    The UK (GP patient records) initiative – a tale of distrust, dissent and delay
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2014, 04288

    UK Enacts New Data Retention Law Following Annulment of Data Retention Directive
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2014, 04287

    UK: Vidal-Hall and Others vs Google Inc
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2014, 03961

    UK: South Lanarkshire Council vs The Scottish Information Commissioner
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2014, 03874

    UK: ICO Issues Guidance on “Bring Your Own Device” Workplace Practices Following Data Breaches
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2013, 03833

    UK: Data Protection Authority publishes interim response to new initiatives for sharing National Health Service patient data
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2013, 03835

    English Court of Appeal: Issues Relating to the Appropriate Method of Awarding Damages for a Breach of Data Protection Law
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2013, 03720

    UK: The Rugby Football Union vs. Viagogo Ltd.
    Beck Online, ZD-Aktuell 2013, 03442

    Grinyer vs. Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust
    ZD-Aktuell 2012, 03229

    UK: High Court zur Definition „personenbezogene Daten“
    ZD-Aktuell 2012, 02732